Project 03 / wearables · productWorking prototype + V3 CAD

Smart Glasses HUD

Open isometric V3 smart glasses assembly showing the boards, battery, audio hardware, display, optical channel, and combiner
Project summary

A working heads-up display developed into a V3 wearable assembly with a folded optical path, temple-mounted electronics, and an integrated enclosure.

Why I built it

To make useful information visible without repeatedly looking down at a phone, while keeping the optics and electronics small enough to wear.

Drag to orbit · Scroll to zoom
V3 interactive assemblyDrag to orbit and zoom into the enclosure, electronics, and combiner.
V3 optical pathDrag to orbit and zoom through the two-fold optical geometry.

From the initial question to a tested result

The timeline traces how the project moved through problem definition, design, prototyping, integration, and validation.

01
01 / Optical proof

Build the adjustable optical prototype

The initial physical build kept the display, controller, wiring, mirror, and combiner accessible. Optical spacing and alignment could be changed quickly before packaging the system into V3.

Original open smart glasses prototype with breadboard, wiring, mirror, and combiner
Initial optical prototypeAn open testbed made spacing and alignment easy to change before committing to wearable packaging.
02
02 / Image visibility

Verify the reflected interface

The testbed established the core path: display light reflects toward a transparent combiner, then into the eye while the surrounding scene remains visible. Keeping the mounts adjustable made image position, focus, brightness, and obstruction observable. V3 carries that same optical sequence into a compact wearable layout, replacing the exposed arrangement with a defined channel and supported optical surfaces.

Original blue OLED interface reflected through the prototype combiner
Projected HUD imageA visible reflected interface established the optical concept before enclosure size became the constraint.
03
03 / Optical geometry

Define the V3 optical geometry

Moving from the testbed to V3 meant fitting the proven reflected-image path beside the glasses temple. The display faces down onto a 45° fold mirror, turning the light 90° toward the nose through a 36 mm channel. A second fold at the combiner directs it toward the eye. The combiner sits at 45° with about 13° of downward tilt to aim the path at the pupil. The design trades the testbed’s easy adjustment for compact packaging, making mirror, channel, and eye alignment the critical geometry. The short optical path still creates a focus limitation: the roughly 67 mm optical path is too close for comfortable focus, so a roughly 50–60 mm focal-length lens is the next optical correction.

V3 optical pathTwo folds keep the light path at temple height; the tilted combiner directs it down to the pupil.
04
04 / Electronics packaging

Distribute electronics along the temple

V2 was 44 mm tall. V3 lays the boards flat in a single layer along the temple, reducing the body to 8.2 mm while accepting about 21 mm of width and 125 mm of length. A face-down OLED and rotated first fold keep the display bump to 12.3 mm. Height was the priority; width and length became the space used to achieve it.

Top view of V3 electronics distributed along the glasses temple
Temple component layoutFlat boards exchange width and length for height: an 8.2 mm body replaces the early 44 mm profile.
05
05 / Enclosure design

Close the enclosure around the assembly

The closed V3 enclosure follows the temple and wraps around the forward optical module. Comparing the open and closed assemblies keeps internal clearance, cover access, and combiner support visible during the CAD revision.

Closed V3 enclosure mounted on the glasses frame
Closed enclosureThe enclosure protects the electronics while preserving the fixed mirror and combiner references.
06
06 / Assembly review

Review the complete wearable

The full assembly and interactive model bring enclosure, component packaging, glasses frame, and combiner placement into one reviewable design. I used the working prototype to establish the display concept, then developed the V3 geometry around the optical path and component clearances.

Complete V3 smart glasses CAD assembly
Complete V3 assemblyKeeping the channel at temple height clears the straight-ahead view, with an upward glance required to read the HUD.

Three decisions that shaped the glasses

01
Key decision

Fold the tested optical path into a wearable module

What I chose

Keep the reflection sequence, change its orientation

Why I chose it

I started with exposed optics so I could move the display, mirror, and combiner independently. Once I could see the interface through the combiner, the next problem was fitting that path beside a glasses arm.

The tradeoff

A shorter package is useful only if the light still reaches the pupil. The final geometry needs tighter alignment, and the short optical distance still needs a focusing lens.

Development and evidence
01

Testbed / Make alignment adjustable

I kept the optics accessible rather than designing the case first. Moving the mounts let me check where the image appeared and whether the reflected display remained visible through the combiner.

Testbed / Make alignment adjustable
02

Optical test / Establish the image path

The reflected interface confirmed the basic sequence: display → mirror → combiner → eye. This gave me a physical starting point for the wearable geometry, rather than relying on CAD alone.

Optical test / Establish the image path
03

V3 / Rotate the first fold

I laid the OLED face down over a 45° mirror. Light turns 90° toward the nose, crosses a 36 mm channel, then reflects from the combiner toward the eye. A 13° downward tip keeps the channel at temple height while aiming at the pupil.

Optical geometryTwo reflections bring the display light to the pupil.
04

Final viewer / Check the geometry together

The viewer connects the screen, both reflections, and the eye position in one model. It makes alignment easier to inspect, but does not prove focus: the roughly 67 mm path still needs a lens to move the apparent image farther away.

Optical geometryTwo reflections bring the display light to the pupil.
02
Key decision

Shrink the profile without blocking the view

What I chose

Use width and length to save height

Why I chose it

The early housing looked bulky because it was tall. I stopped treating all three dimensions equally and prioritized height, even when that meant a longer, wider package along the temple.

The tradeoff

The body becomes about 21 mm wide and 125 mm long. Cutting the optical surfaces also reduces the margin for pupil position.

Development and evidence
01

Testbed / Prove function before packaging

The exposed build gave me room to adjust optics and wiring. It was useful for testing, but its arrangement was not a wearable form factor.

Testbed / Prove function before packaging
02

V2 / Identify what sets the height

The first assembly was 44 mm tall. The full 30 × 42 mm combiner and upright components drove the profile. Shrinking the case alone would not solve that; the internal arrangement had to change.

Current V3 geometry shown for comparison; no V2 render is available.
V2 / Identify what sets the height
03

V3 / Flatten the component layer

I laid the boards and battery flat along the temple instead of stacking them. The body drops to 8.2 mm: a 6 mm arm plus 1 mm clip lips above and below. The display folds downward into a 12.3 mm bump.

V3 / Flatten the component layer
04

V3 / Reduce the optical envelope

I reduced the combiner to 16 × 8 mm and the mirror to 8.4 × 13 mm, covering the display footprint with alignment margin. Keeping the light channel high clears the straight-ahead view; reading the HUD requires an upward glance.

V3 / Reduce the optical envelope
03
Key decision

Clear the straight-ahead field of view

What I chose

Stop the housing short of the pupil and support the combiner at one edge

Why I chose it

A compact HUD can still feel intrusive if its mounting hardware crosses the view. I shortened the channel so it ends 8.5 mm before the pupil line, then supported the glass with a small outer-edge clip.

The tradeoff

The combiner has only about 1.7 mm of grip and needs adhesive. The clip must hold alignment without clipping the light.

Development and evidence
01

Support only where the light does not pass

The eye-side clip jaw blocked light reaching the outer 1 mm of the combiner. I notched that jaw along the light path while keeping material above and below it. This preserves the support while opening the optical aperture.

Support only where the light does not pass
02

Move the image above the main view

The tilted combiner directs the display down toward the pupil from temple height. The image sits about 18° above straight ahead, keeping the main view clear at the cost of an upward glance.

Move the image above the main view

A working HUD prototype informed the V3 assembly, which combines a folded optical path, temple-distributed electronics, and an integrated enclosure. The interactive CAD and optical models make the packaging and eye-alignment decisions inspectable.