Project 07 / roboticsIEEE publication

Turning 2D LiDAR scans into autonomous road repair

Project summary

An autonomous road-repair research system that uses 2D LiDAR to estimate pothole geometry and guide a custom filling mechanism.

Why I built it

To connect low-cost sensing with a physical repair action, so road defects could be measured and filled more consistently.

From the initial question to a tested result

The timeline traces how the project moved through problem definition, design, prototyping, integration, and validation.

01
01 / Perception

Convert range profiles into road-surface evidence.

The pipeline identified surface anomalies, estimated depth and geometry, and reconstructed enough of the pothole to support volume analysis.

+chart
Scan → reconstructionOne real scan transformed through surface profile, anomaly detection, geometry estimation, and volume output.
02
02 / Physical action

Sensing was connected to intervention.

The system linked estimated repair volume to a custom filling mechanism, making the project a complete cyber-physical loop rather than a detection demo.

2Dsensor3Dgeometry inferredIEEEMIT URTC

Three decisions that shaped the project

Each decision connects a technical constraint to the choice I made, the analysis behind it, and the tradeoff that followed.

01
Key decision

Sensing

What I chose

2D LiDAR

Why

The system needed affordable, repeatable road-surface measurements without the data and compute burden of a full 3D sensor. A planar scan offered enough structure for geometric estimation.

The tradeoff

Reduced cost and processing load while requiring geometric inference instead of direct dense 3D capture.

Analysis and evidence / 01 / Perception

Convert range profiles into road-surface evidence.

The pipeline identified surface anomalies, estimated depth and geometry, and reconstructed enough of the pothole to support volume analysis.

+chart
Scan → reconstructionOne real scan transformed through surface profile, anomaly detection, geometry estimation, and volume output.
02
Key decision

Pipeline

What I chose

Geometry before filling

Why

Estimating shape and volume before dispensing connects sensing directly to material use, producing a controlled repair command rather than a simple detect-and-fill response.

The tradeoff

Added computation up front to estimate repair material and guide a more controlled fill.

Analysis and evidence / 02 / Physical action

Sensing was connected to intervention.

The system linked estimated repair volume to a custom filling mechanism, making the project a complete cyber-physical loop rather than a detection demo.

+video
Repair sequenceExperimental clip from detection through filling, with captions identifying each subsystem transition.
03
Key decision

Mechanism

What I chose

Purpose-built dispenser

Why

The task demanded predictable placement of repair material more than broad manipulation ability, so a dedicated mechanism concentrated complexity on the actual road-repair operation.

The tradeoff

Improved task fit at the expense of general-purpose manipulation.

The project produced an experimental system, technical paper, and presentation at the 2024 IEEE MIT Undergraduate Research Technology Conference.